Approvals
Quotes, discounts, purchase orders and timesheets routed to the right approver with reminders and an audit trail.
✦ Process automation
Automation is not about removing people. It is about removing the twenty minutes a day each of them spends copying, chasing and checking - and the errors that come with it.
✦ Candidates
High frequency, clear rules and a real cost when they go wrong. Start there.
Quotes, discounts, purchase orders and timesheets routed to the right approver with reminders and an audit trail.
Quotes, contracts, certificates, delivery notes and invoices produced from live data instead of a template someone edits.
The follow-ups a person currently remembers to send: overdue jobs, expiring certificates, unsigned documents.
The re-typing that exists purely because two tools do not talk to each other.
The Monday morning spreadsheet, built automatically and sent to the people who need it.
New customer, supplier or employee setup, with tasks assigned and nothing quietly skipped.
✦ Method
Not the documented process - the real one, including the workaround everybody uses and nobody mentions.
Some steps exist because of a decision made years ago. Removing a step is cheaper than automating it, and we will say so.
Keep human judgement where judgement is needed. Automate the fetching, formatting, routing and chasing around it.
Every automated path needs a way for a person to intervene, with a record of who did and why.
Time per transaction before and after, error rate, and how often the override gets used. If it did not move, we change it.
✦ Boundaries
Judgement calls. If a decision depends on knowing a customer, reading a situation or weighing risk, automating it produces confident nonsense.
Processes that are about to change. Automating a workflow three weeks before you reorganise the department wastes the build.
Rare exceptions. If something happens twice a year, a person handling it manually is cheaper than the code and the maintenance.
Anything where the automation would be harder to check than the task itself. If nobody can tell whether it worked, it will silently stop working.
✦ Included
✦ Questions we get asked
In our experience it moves people onto work that needed doing anyway. The typical result is the same team handling more volume without recruiting, not a smaller team.
We agree the measures up front - time per transaction, error rate, how often a human overrides it - and instrument the system so you can see them without asking us.
It routes to a person with the context attached, rather than failing silently or forcing a bad decision. Exceptions are designed in, not treated as a defect.
Often yes - through APIs, workflow features you already pay for, or an integration layer. Building new software is not always the answer, and we will tell you when it is not.
Not usually. Robotic process automation drives a user interface as if it were a person, which breaks whenever the screen changes. We prefer to work at the data layer, and only use UI automation where there is genuinely no other route in.
Thirty minutes. Bring the process, the systems it touches and the deadline. You'll leave with an approach and an honest answer on whether custom software is the right call.
No pitch deck · We map your process · You own the software